“Page three is like an onion.”

Today was the first time in more than four decades that The Sun newspaper printed a picture of a glamour model on page three with her breasts covered up. That’s right, instead of the usual topless photo, there was an image of a lady in a bikini. This move from bare to concealed came after the group No More Page Three started a campaign to stop the tradition that has become expected of the tabloid. Great! They made some progress, which I think is pretty awesome. But do I believe that covering boobs up is the answer? Absolutely not.

I’m a woman and I am definitely a feminist, so initially, my opinion might surprise you. But to me, the problem is nothing to do with breasts.

The problem here is the fact that we have a culture where displaying a picture of a half-naked woman inside a publication that covers news, current affairs and politics is considered the norm. The problem is that it has become okay, and usual, for people to flick through an everyday newspaper and ogle a woman, before carrying on with their reading. The problem isn’t to do with glamour models or boobs, the problem is about what kind of message this is spreading to society.

We live in a culture where there is a still a difference in salaries between the genders, where there is still a tiny percentage of women in top-jobs when compared with men, where females are still offered fewer opportunities than males. It’s slowly getting better, but we are still no where near equality. And when you open The Sun and find a half naked woman sprawled across the page, it’s almost easy to see why. We are still nothing more than sex objects, in some people’s eyes.

I’m not suggesting that I am anti-glamour model. In fact, I am all for women showing any part of their bodies, whenever they want to, because I believe in choice. I am friends with models, ex-strippers, and I myself, am a pole dancer. I believe in sexuality. I believe in expressing yourself! What I don’t believe in is the objectification of one gender over another.

If there was a male counterpart to page three, I’m sure I would be taking a very different stance on things. The argument wouldn’t be against the objectification of women then. It would just be about printing sexual images, which I don’t particularly have a problem with. My main gripe is that it’s just women we’ve focused on for the last 45 years. And in this day and age, that seems pretty backwards. We’re supposed to be about change, about moving forward with feminism, not to make us better than men, but to make us the same – oh wait, but then there are pictures of us printed in a newspaper for men to drool over as they read about football… yeah, we’re really being taken seriously.

After all the pressure put on The Sun by Say No To Page Three, I am really pleased that they were listened to and a change, albeit small, was made. However I think that censoring nipples, by putting women in bikinis or lingerie as they pose on this page, has made no difference. We’re still being treated as sex objects in a publication that has no need for it, nipples or not. In my eyes, don’t have a page three at all, or have a page three for women, and a page three for men, to make it fair.

These are just my musings on the topic, and like so many other issues surrounding equality, there are many, many arguments and opinions. My friend summed it up brilliantly when we were discussing it earlier, and said “Page three is like an onion, there are a lot of layers.”

If you have anything you’d like to add, agreeing or disagreeing with me, please leave it in the comments below. Debate is healthy and I’m interested to hear other peoples’ opinions!

Frankie x


4 thoughts on ““Page three is like an onion.”

  1. I loved debating this on your FB. I still think that page 3 has contributed to many women’s careers (giving them a platform) and that it should be a woman’s choice whether or not she wants to pose topless. I feel that page 3 was part of the sun, and it is a shame that the women posing for it are being forced to cover up. In today’s society, many girls/women aspire to be like the glamour models on page 3, and by removing it, they may be forced to appear in magazines with far more adult content in order to be noticed. I feel that porn films/magazines objectify and portray women in a far worse light and glamour models may have to take a step closer to an arguably more “seedy” industry in order to follow their career aspirations.
    Someone on the debate yesterday also mentioned breast feeding – and I feel as though removing breasts from page 3 only reinforces negative attitudes to women having their breasts out in public. I sunbathe topless on holiday (to avoid ugly tan lines that soo don’t go with nice dresses!) will I soon be told to cover up too?
    I feel that men and women are equal in the sense that each is human, but each person (regardless of sex) has their own strengths, capabilities etc. I don’t think you can expect equality between individuals in as much that one person may be capable of doing a £100,000 a year job, when another person may lack the skills and business sense.
    Yesterday’s debate really opened my eyes to how many different opinions and perspectives there are out there – and I think all are right in their own ways. My beliefs and thoughts on the subject reflect my world and how I choose to live my life, so I can appreciate that my views may not fit everyone.
    I love your article Frankie 🙂 thank u for giving us all the opportunity to discuss with you xxx


    • Thanks for reading Nikki! Just to reply to your points – I understand that page three was a part of The Sun that will be missed but my point is really looking at how bizarre it is that we have a page about ogling women in a newspaper in the first place.

      As for girls aspiring to be on page three, I have no problem with that, as I said, sexuality and modelling isn’t something I’m against and I know it’s helped to launch a lot of careers, I was sort of looking at the bigger picture of the objectification of women in the media in general.

      Sunbathing nude on holiday is totally different. I would argue that no, women shouldn’t be told to cover up! I’m not saying I’m anti-breasts at all, we’re women, we should be proud of our bodies, and I am in no way anti glamour model. What I’m saying is that it’s the concept of a page just about women that I have a problem with, if there was a page about men’s bodies too, it would be equal, and therefore I wouldn’t really have much of an argument!

      Frankie x


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s